Видео

Remember; Elons plans May be a bit optimistic.. but Why do you claim its promises? Isnt it just forward looking statements? Doing something newest done before?

The next few months are crucial to Elon being the nr1 enemy of the US dems he is likely to lose Tesla after the shareholder vote early june. He already stated that he will than separate his IA / robotaxi and human robots from Tesla one way or the other. He already put most expansion of Tesla on hold pending this vote! Spacex is already financially more important to him than Tesla and his potential exit will make Spacex even more Important to him! So yes he is in a hurry a successful breakthrough of Starship will be the best consolation to him and he will need this before he starts the epic fight to take the IA and FSD activities separate from Tesla in order to keep control!

If Starship is planned to launch three times a day, that means over 1,500 launches a year.

SpaceX should go for it with IFT 5 if IFT 4 goes according to plan! Better to test and fail than not to try. Can make omelets with breaking a few eggs.

So many omissions and much misinformation, please do a better job on the research. Try and match commentary with images that match. Great start, keep it up

Wil, I’m actually surprised they don't place a huge deployable inflatable balloon in the cargo bay. Why not? If they could keep Starship afloat and tow it back to shallow waters then recover it, I would imagine they'd learn quite a bit. Allowing it to sink means losing all that information. Just my thoughts. Thank you.

If SpaceX nails the virtual landing they will try the starbase landing.

Thanks Brother! Do you think the chopsticks will move as the booster approaches its soft-water landing? Simulating the catch at the tower too?

It's not a mini space station! The volume inside the starship that is habitable is larger than the entire space station. You put two of these up and you have more room and space than ever before including all countries combined

Acho que quando estiver submerso será emplodido para não cair nas maos erradas.

Of course Space X should try to land the Ship on the chopsticks. This will only be attempted if the Ship has a approach course within the error profile Space X has calculated. If the trajectory is outside the safe paramaters it will be blown up or guided to "land" safely in the Gulf.

If it can't land it can explode there... still a spectacle to watch.😂

Question, can the booster/tanker fly without Starship?

5:53 "Uh-vee-ree min-uh-mum-list-ic" - No! That is an ugly misuse of suffix, the term is *minimalist,* for it already describes a thin or being as "of or pertaining to minimal." Only you mouth-breathers double up on suffix, for you have no sense of depth in the the full value of each suffix, insisting on redundant emphasis which you can not see. It is a pain to hear your kind speak, it is unfortunate that 80% of the population speaks that way for that is how many mouth-breathers exist. Your kind will keep chaining suffix, to je degree of demised sense regarding exactly how versatile each suffix is. It's as if you can't sense their anatomy as living pulses of probability. That, to me, is quite daft.

Go SpaceX!

Hi I got a question, I want to go for the next launch is there any recommendations, because I can't see it from Fl, what is the force on take off, and what speed until it gets to space, once it gets to space what are the expectations and destination?

Katthy is amazing.

That woman should be investigated... She was working for the NASA responsible for giving contracts. Spacex got the contract and now she works for Spacex. RED FLAGS!!!!

So how do you people plan on busting through the firmament? LOL

If space X did show the ship blowing up, and not trying to hide it... this clean up would not have to happen.

Instead of a hovercraft, what about a simple wooden pier on Boca Chica beach? Lots of public beaches have piers. The general public seems to like them. So then the end of the pier could be used for boats to ferry people to/from SPI and other places.

a cable car ropeway round trip would be attractive for tourists

Where was this broadcast?

Awesome SpaceX ❤❤❤

I made it

Hey! We'll both earn $50 when you join Current and receive a qualifying Direct Deposit. Terms apply. Just use my link or code when signing up. Code: WILLIAMW243 current.com/get-started/?creator_code=WILLIAMW243

It’s embarrassing to have a NASA director like Nelson.

The reason you believe China military mission is bc China go to farside (dark) of moon? Why he said u not plan going there? Fair competition! China never stop others go there. Are you capable of going "dark" to explore it, joker?

No chance am I getting on that. Let Elon go

If they can land on a virtual tower a few times, then they will be in a position to try it. They are still far away from that. It seems like people forgot how IFT3 went..

It will land where it took off. The tower is already being modified to catch it. Not really a risk as they will build an updated second tower . And rebuild the first one anyway.

The orbital launch pad will be taken down and rebuilt . The second pad will be modified and built incorporating what they learned from the first pad. When they build the one at the cape that will be closer to the final design.

Thank you, Wesley Crusher!

USA reject China application to join international spert

😊👍🚀💯

Thanks for the video. Cool hat! I know I'm late to the comments but one thought about Artemis starship vs dear moon: for Artemis SpaceX not only needs the starship and the whole tanker logistics to be worked out, they also need to develop specific things for this program such as docking with the Orion capsule for crew transfer and development of the crew lift for use on the moon itself. They will probably also need to test land on the moon before going there with crew. If they would prioritize dear moon over these things then I would understand if Nasa were less than amused. So I think it is not only the admittedly very real question of prestige but also the question of priorities that may create some problem for dear moon for the next years...

The recent animation they released shows booster coming in at an angle as opposed to mostly straight down, presumably allowing for a last moment divert into the Gulf. Of course something could go wrong when the catch is being made so it would still be putting the tower at risk.

I'd try to keep it afloat as long as possible to get as much external visual data from booster possible then sink it. Lov the show🤜🏽✌🏽❤

It just occurred to me that they have no room at Starbase to store all those starships they plan to produce there. They must be planning to launch them at Starbase and then land them someplace else for storage or they must be planning to ship them maybe even in modules. They don't have room for storage at Starbase. That is a fact I think we can all agree on.

I believe a counter-weight is needed on those towers...

They should’ve just put landing legs on them and be done with it! He risks loosing too much if the booster/ship blows up! I don’t see it working every time, it’s a crapshoot. I’d love to see it work but I just can’t say it will. We’ll find out soon

The ship will come thru the atmosphere hot and it won't be able to slow down, so it will hit the water hard and break up.

That thing will float like a cork. Such a long length and so light. It might draught a meter? Empty it’s 200t ? It’s going to look crazy

Its a terrible idea to catch the booster until you have a backup launch tower

New hair cut ?.

Claro. Hasta podrían con un submarino, ir a buscar un Raptor.

Whether it is worth the risk depends on how the virtual landing in the ocean goes. As long as the booster slows itself properly so it approaches slowly, the odds of the booster damaging the tower so much that they couldn't fix it by IFT-6 seems minimal.

Barrrrge, matey

speculations from SpaceX like robot taxi.

Every time I hit the subscribe bell i get unsubscribed, so I'm not going to do that anymore!😊🤪🙃